´´ The J-System (Part Three) - Lifetime Employment

Friday, November 14, 2014

The J-System (Part Three) - Lifetime Employment

"The nail that sticks up gets hammered down" (Japanese Proverb)

Introduction


Japan's seemingly relentless ascent between 1950 and 1989 from an economy decimated by a devastating World War and towards a global power house in only a few decades stunned many Japan observers in the west.

Not only were the nominal and per capita growth rates in Japan during that time breathtaking, also the efficiency of corporate Japan was. The annual growth rate per work hour was more than double that of the United States throughout the 1970s. (Puchniak)

In the 1980s, major Japanese manufacturing firms such as Toyota, Nissan, Toshiba, Hitachi, and Nippon Steel had grown highly competitive and made great inroads into US and European markets. In the US automobile industry, where the mass production system had been invented, Ford and GM were greatly surprised to discover the "flexible" mass production system developed by Toyota and the uniqueness of the underlying Japanese methods concerning human resource management (HRM). As the key to the high productivity of Japanese manufacturers, Japanese-style employment practice came to receive a great deal of attention from overseas researchers and practitioners, as it was an important pillar in the overall Japanese corporate governance and organization framework, the so called J- System. (Moriguchi)

Collectivism has historically been a core value for Japanese. Self-definition in the Japanese society has been a product of relationships. Although the significance has gradually diminished since Japan ended its isolation policy (Sakoku) during the Tokugawa regime of the mid-nineteenth century and it became more open to western influences, key practices like an emphasis on continuity, group integrity and egalitarianism remain in effect. Following World War II, the logic still played a critical role in (re-)forming Japanese corporations.

In addition, it extended from the intercorporation relationship, and the relationship between the corporation and its white collar workers, to include the blue collar employees as well. After WW2 Japanese workers started viewing its corporation as an arena to reflect their identification with the collective, and a context in which the constructed organizational norms reinforce the employee’s identification with the organization.

In this respect corporations were considered to be the group to which one primarily belongs and dedicates one’s life, almost like a family in the western sense. Indeed, the family principles, along with the Japanese values of collectivism and long-term orientation, played prominent roles in shaping traditional Japanese management approaches. (Kobayashi et al) The unique lifetime employment and Japanese HRM system, which started to develop in the interwar period, should be analyzed in that context.

This post is the last part of a series intended to shed some light on the J- System.

The first part  tackled the role of the Japanese main bank in the J- System.

The second part was dedicated to presenting Japan's Keiretsu network system in corporate Japan.

This last part will scrutinize the phenomenon of lifetime employment that is regarded to be unique to Japan. Lifetime employment is only one pillar, although the most important, of the overall Japanese HRM System. The other two are seniority wage (and promotion) and enterprise unionism.


-1-

Pages: 1 2 3 4

2 comments:

  1. What is your opinion on a strategy of buying stocks in japan that earn low ROEs but are selling below liquidating value?

    For example take a stock like nankai plywood. It is very cheap on assets and while they aren't earning much, it is not destroying value either. In the US a diversified list of stocks like that usually works out well. But I have heard that a lot of investors have not had much luck with these types of investments in Japan. My guess is that is because many of them are destined to always earn earn pitiful returns on capital because of the culture over there.

    I should add that I do not speak japanese and am relying on the financial statements on reuters and sometimes a little more info gleaned from translations of their reports using google translate to make my decisions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi matjone,

    I've written about net-net strategies generally and net- nets in Japan extensively on this blog. I think those posts will answer most of your questions.

    http://undervaluedjapan.blogspot.de/2012/11/about-japanese-net-nets-q.html

    http://undervaluedjapan.blogspot.de/2013/10/discrimination-in-selecting-net-net.html

    http://undervaluedjapan.blogspot.de/2012/12/graham-and-dodd-discrimination-in.html

    I do own net-nets in Japan. But I am extremely choosy when buying into one. Personally I have had better results with stocks that are slightly more expensive but have better operational showings, are more shareholder friendly, dominant market shares in certain applications/ products, etc. You won't find those with a simple stock screen.

    ReplyDelete